Last weekend, we tried out the newest restaurant in Half Moon Bay, Sam's Chowder House. Although it bills itself as "authentic New England style seafood," it's a pretty Californicated version, if only due to the militia of young, attractive California kids serving the food, placing a plate in front of you with statements like, "Here's your seafood goodness."
I have to say that overall, we were pleased with our experience there. The ocean views are incredible. It's a huge place, and already has the feel of a well established institution, which I'm sure it will be. One of the things I liked best was how kid-friendly it was. There were dozens of little ones running around, and the hostess hands out quality crayons with multiple pages of big, simple designs for coloring. Although there were no changing tables in the men's room (no excuse for that in a modern restaurant!), the women's room was a nice enough place to change a diaper. Come to think of it, I guess Jacob maybe have been lying about the absence of a changing table in the men's room. ;-)
The food was good. We had the New England clam chowder, which tasted not as thick as the real New England versions I've had, but like a fresher, richer California version, with a top quality cream, good potatoes, and lots of clam. I had a fish sandwich and Old Bay seasoned fries. The fries were thin, frozen fries, but they came with aioli, which made me pretty happy. And they claim to use sustainably farmed seafood whenever possible, which is nice to see (and also very Californian of them).
Prices were reasonable if not cheap. The music was horrid - REO Speedwagon and such - but luckily the volume was low enough that we could tune it out. Overall, I say we'll be back. It's a nice alternative to Barbara's Fish Trap if you're paying by credit card (if you've been to Barbara's, you know they only take cash).
Incidentally, Sam's was opened by the same folks who brought us Cetrella, a fancy schmancy Half Moon Bay restaurant that consistently gets rave reviews. I have to admit that the one time we ate there, I wasn't much impressed, but I've been meaning to give it another try.
Saturday, April 28, 2007
Thursday, April 26, 2007
Vietnamese food in San Jose
So I've been meaning to try out some of the Vietnamese food in San Jose for a while, and finally got around to it earlier this month. And I have to say that it was unequivocally the best Vietnamese food I've ever had. Taking the recommendation of the concierge at the Moorpark Hotel, we went to Vung Tau downtown. The atmosphere was nice - tastfully done and very clean. The service was attentive. And the food! Delicious. Fresh. Yummmmmmmy. I can't decide which dish was my favorite: the shredded green papaya salad, the rice salad with beef and lemongrass, the sea bass cooked in a clay pot, or the tamarind shrimp soup.
What was I doing staying at a hotel in San Jose? Oh, you'll have to wait for the story in the Chronicle to read all about it.
What was I doing staying at a hotel in San Jose? Oh, you'll have to wait for the story in the Chronicle to read all about it.
Labels:
Moorpark Hotel,
San Jose,
Vietnamese restaurants,
Vung Tau
Sunday, April 1, 2007
Condors go back into the wild at Pinnacles National Monument
My story on the condors at Pinnacles National Monument is out - in both the Santa Cruz Sentinel and the SF Chronicle. The stories give visitors an idea of what to expect when going to Pinnacles to see California condors during a release of 5 young birds that are joining the already existing Pinnacles flock. The release date of April 21 will mark almost to the day the 20th year anniversary of the capture of the last wild condor. To get tips on viewing them, read the article.
I wasn't able to go into as much detail as I would have liked in the articles simply because of word count and scope, but the story of the condor is fascinating. It is generally accepted to be an ecologically unimportant species, and yet we have spent millions of dollars and incredible effort trying to save it. It has been a hot button issue for environmentalists, many of whom (particularly David Brower) thought that the last wild condors should never have been captured in the first place, even though there were only 22 birds left and the species was facing almost certain extinction. Those extremists believe that the species died when the last one was captured, because they officially ceased to be wild.
Then there is another camp of people, led by Noel Snyder, who believe that the birds in captivity should never have been released back into the wild, since whatever it was that was killing the birds is still out there in the environment. We now know with near certainty, thanks to a UCSC study, that the leading killer of condors is lead from ammunition, which shatters when it hits the bones of hunted animals, whose carcasses are then fed on by condors. Lead poisoning first dulls the birds' reactions (which might be leading them to their second most lethal habit: flying into power lines), then makes them more and more lethargic until they eventually stop eating, stop moving, and die. In spite of the facts that lead is a threat to many animals, including humans, and that there are safe, equally effective, non-lead alternatives, hunters continue to use lead bullets. So we are releasing the birds into an environment that is continuing to poison them.
The condor recovery program is succeeding in its growth of the species thanks in large part to captive breeding (which through a process called double clutching allows the birds to reproduce faster than in nature), but whether the birds will continue to prosper when humans stop tracking them and treating them for lead poisoning remains to be seen. If you're interested in the topic, I highly recommend reading John Nielsen's book: Condor, to the Brink and Back. Not only is it a comprehensive study of the condor recovery program, but it is beautifully written, narrating the tales of the individual people working with individual birds to save the species.
I wasn't able to go into as much detail as I would have liked in the articles simply because of word count and scope, but the story of the condor is fascinating. It is generally accepted to be an ecologically unimportant species, and yet we have spent millions of dollars and incredible effort trying to save it. It has been a hot button issue for environmentalists, many of whom (particularly David Brower) thought that the last wild condors should never have been captured in the first place, even though there were only 22 birds left and the species was facing almost certain extinction. Those extremists believe that the species died when the last one was captured, because they officially ceased to be wild.
Then there is another camp of people, led by Noel Snyder, who believe that the birds in captivity should never have been released back into the wild, since whatever it was that was killing the birds is still out there in the environment. We now know with near certainty, thanks to a UCSC study, that the leading killer of condors is lead from ammunition, which shatters when it hits the bones of hunted animals, whose carcasses are then fed on by condors. Lead poisoning first dulls the birds' reactions (which might be leading them to their second most lethal habit: flying into power lines), then makes them more and more lethargic until they eventually stop eating, stop moving, and die. In spite of the facts that lead is a threat to many animals, including humans, and that there are safe, equally effective, non-lead alternatives, hunters continue to use lead bullets. So we are releasing the birds into an environment that is continuing to poison them.
The condor recovery program is succeeding in its growth of the species thanks in large part to captive breeding (which through a process called double clutching allows the birds to reproduce faster than in nature), but whether the birds will continue to prosper when humans stop tracking them and treating them for lead poisoning remains to be seen. If you're interested in the topic, I highly recommend reading John Nielsen's book: Condor, to the Brink and Back. Not only is it a comprehensive study of the condor recovery program, but it is beautifully written, narrating the tales of the individual people working with individual birds to save the species.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)